Skip to main content
search

Brooklyn Letters IconBrooklyn Letters

1139 Prospect Avenue, Brooklyn

4.9 56 reviews

  • Avatar Emily Matles ★★★★★ a week ago
    We would highly recommend Ally! Our son always asks about her, so very thankful to Brooklyn Letters for introducing us.
    ~ Emily, mom of Brooklyn 2 year old
  • Avatar T Ainsley ★★★★★ 5 months ago
    I cannot express how grateful and rewarding my experience with Brooklyn Letters has been. Her tutor Ms. Daria is so knowledgeable, amazing, kind and awesome. My daughter has made so much progress in Literacy and Math and it's all … More thanks to Ms. Daria. I know my daughter is sad that she can no longer work with Ms. Daria, as she looked forward to their sessions every week. Thank you again!
  • Avatar Natalie Levon ★★★★★ 4 months ago
    Nicole has been an amazing therapist!! She played a tremendous role in our daughter’s speech progress and overall development. She has come such a long way and we are so happy with the therapy she received!
  • Avatar Colin Peters ★★★★★ 6 months ago
    We could not be happier with the services Valerie provided! She is very thoughtful and knowledgeable and provided significant guidance to support our daughter's speech development outside of our scheduled sessions. She established … More a great working relationship with her, and she will definitely be missed! Your business model is amazing and it was an absolute pleasure working with Valerie. I've referred your organization and Valerie to the Executive Director of our daughter's school and friends/colleagues who are in need of speech therapy services.
  • Avatar Lil Amatore ★★★★★ 7 months ago
    Christina was absolutely wonderful. She went out of her way to win my son over and it worked. He looked forward to her visits and his speech improved so much under her care. She was super flexible and it’s clear she truly cares. We adore … More Christina and we’re going to miss her. Almost sad he improved so much! She’s simply amazing and we can’t say enough how great she is. I would recommend her services to anyone and everyone, without hesitation. Thank you so much for connecting us with her!
  • Avatar Heather Liljengren ★★★★★ a year ago
    We cannot say enough good things about Effie, the ASL teacher, who was so engaged and effective with our 2 year old daughter from the very first session! Effie gladly included our whole family in the sessions! Her expertise and fantastic … More personality gave our daughter a way to communicate that she was so desperately seeking. The coordinators at Brooklyn Letters were so helpful and communicative…I would highly recommend their services!
  • Avatar Brigid Bower ★★★★★ 11 months ago
    Samantha Dalmas was fantastic! We saw her for a feeding therapy evaluation and while she doesn’t think my daughter needs more feeding therapy sessions at this time, but she gave me lots of tips to try. If my daughter's doctors want … More to see more progress at her next appointment, I wouldn’t hesitate to reach out to Samantha again.
  • Avatar Duygu Başaran ★★★★★ 11 months ago
    Brooklyn Letters was recommended to me through a friend's speech therapist friend in NJ. The articulation evaluation for my daughter went well. We were pleased with Kristin's services.
  • Avatar Kelley Peters-Patel ★★★★★ a year ago
    Melissa was wonderful. Our daughter warmed to her immediately and by the time she left, had already started "practicing" some of the techniques Melissa had shown her. I will not hesitate at all to reach out to Melissa again, should … More the need arise.
  • Avatar R Elmore ★★★★★ a year ago
    Aileen was INCREDIBLY helpful to us, both in assessing possible origins of my grandson's food aversions, as well as informing us of various available interventions to consider.
    I can’t thank you and Brooklyn Letters enough for connecting
    … More us with Aileen. In all our feeding therapy journey we have not gotten anything near the kind of benefit that we did from her. Her knowledge, professionalism, and responsiveness have put us on the path of progress with my grandson and has also made us feel genuinely well cared for.
  • Avatar Christine Weiher ★★★★★ 2 years ago
    We were amazed with Allison! She met my son at 2 1/2 years old, not speaking much at all, and over a computer, and she was able to develop a bond and friendship, so much so that he would look forward to his weekly computer time with Allison. … More I was not sure how the speech therapy would go- but we are so happy that we tried it out and continued. It allowed my son to gain confidence in his speech, make a new friend :), and also give him the skills and a bit of understanding of how to shape his mouth or where to place his tongue to make the proper sounds. We were extremely happy with Allison- she was fantastic to work with.
  • Avatar Andrea Saffady ★★★★★ 2 years ago
    My sessions with Karen have been extremely helpful. My speech has improved tremendously. In fact, I just finished 2 hours of conducting interviews with a consulting client via MS Teams and I have an upcoming conference call. Both my … More neurologist and neurosurgeon remarked about how good my speech is. Much of the day it is perfect, although I still have some rough spots when I get tired or speak too quickly. One of my granddaughters is a speech pathology student at Ithaca College. She sat in on 2 sessions while she was home for winter break, and she was very impressed with Karen.
  • Avatar Jacob B ★★★★★ 4 years ago
    We were delighted with Christie. First, and most importantly, our son made great strides under her guidance. So great, that we felt he no longer needed help! She was incredibly patient and kind with him and our son really responded to … More her. Christie was also great with me and my wife. She provided thorough and informative updates on our son's progress and which exercises she was using with him, so we could reinforce what she was teaching him. All in all, we had a fabulous experience with Christie and would highly recommend her.
  • Avatar Jessica C ★★★★★ a year ago
    Theo was wonderful and his work with my son has produced some progress. I am grateful for the services Theo provided.
  • Avatar Melissa Stevens ★★★★★ 2 years ago
    Highly recommend Jill. She is a total pleasure to work with. After a few months working with Jill, my son is reading above grade level and LOVES to read. Mission accomplished!
  • Avatar Demet Evren ★★★★★ 2 years ago
    Paige was great and we had been really happy with her. I would highly recommend her! I recommend Brooklyn Letters to whomever asks for a speech therapist.
  • Avatar Jeizel Rosenthal ★★★★★ 2 years ago
    Isabel was WONDERFUL and our son absolutely adored her, and he is making great progress with his reading and writing.
  • Avatar Lesley Duval ★★★★★ 3 years ago
    Theo was fantastic with our 4yo son. We were very worried that his progress would fall off when we had to switch to remote sessions, but Theo kept our son happy and engaged through the screen. Highly highly recommend!
  • Avatar Samantha Packard ★★★★★ 3 years ago
    We've been working with Theo from Brooklyn Letters for close to 4 months now and the results are apparent; our daughter has vastly improved her speech in a relatively short amount of time. We make "Theo Day" a celebration … More in our house with pancakes for breakfast, and the enthusiasm is matched in the sessions. Theo is fun, patient, professional, and caring, and he gives us the tools to take the lessons beyond the session. Thank you Theo, and Brooklyn Letters, for helping our daughter express herself.
  • Avatar Travis Ricca ★★★★★ 3 years ago
    I worked with Alina to enhance my pronunciation, tone, and pacing while communicating socially and in a work environment. She was great to work with and clear about goals and learning objectives. The improvement from day 1 has been tremendous! … More
  • Avatar Enrico Bermudez ★★★★★ 3 years ago
    Cathy has been excellent with us and our son. We will sorely miss her. He has improved significantly with Cathy’s help. Cathy was a true partner with us, especially as we pursued additional help through our son’s school system.
  • Avatar Kayne Elisabeth Wilk ★★★★★ 4 years ago
    We really loved working with Alina, she is so fantastic. Patient yet firm, and determined the best course of action very clearly and succintly for us. And it all transitioned so well to Zoom as well. I will definitely be back in touch for … More services for our other child after summer break!
  • Avatar Jen S ★★★★★ 4 years ago
    Vera was amazing! My 11 yo daughter made progress so quickly and really looked forward to her sessions. She was kept motivated and engaged.
  • Avatar susie tofte ★★★★★ 3 years ago
    The work that Allison P. did with our daughter over the years has been invaluable to us. Our daughter had such a good relationship with Allison, and it allowed them to work really well together - even remotely these past 6 months. This … More year, Allison went above and beyond by helping us throughout the neuropsych eval we did, trying to re-open our daughter's IEP at her school, and eventually landing her at our chosen school. She was in contact with our daughter's teachers, with the neuropsychologist, and made herself available as a reference to speak on behalf of our daughter's learning differences.
    Allison stopped by our house last week to give our daughter cupcakes and say goodbye, and I literally cried with appreciation for what an amazing speech therapist she has been. She has been our daughter's biggest champion. The new families that she will work with this year are lucky to have her.
  • Avatar Alicia Perez-Katz ★★★★★ 4 years ago
    Sydney was great! Our son was sad to end his sessions with her, which says a lot. We appreciated her honest assessment of his skill level, and he now has materials to self monitor and practice. Thank you!
  • Avatar Kristin Ames ★★★★★ 4 years ago
    Our experience with Theo was terrific. Theo was great with my son. He developed a positive relationship with him based on sincerity, respect, trust and a deep personal connection. In their lessons, Theo was encouraging, creative and kind. … More He helped our son understand how to differentiate the sounds he made when he spoke, and gave him great exercises to practice every week between lessons. Our son was sorry to have the lessons come to an end, but recognized that Theo had helped him as much as possible and it was time for him to stop. Theo explained to him (and us) how to keep working to get the last 5%, and encouraged him to keep working on the exercises on his own. I have recommended Theo to another parent who noticed my son's improvement and inquired for her own son.
    We are all grateful to have gotten to know Theo, and we greatly appreciate all the work he did to help our son.
  • Avatar Aisha Holder ★★★★★ 4 years ago
    "I have nothing but wonderful things to say about Michelle Macroy-Higgins. We are extremely pleased with her work with our daughter. I was so grateful for my daughter to have a speech therapist who is a researcher (specialty in late … More talkers), graduate professor and practitioner. Her expertise was clearly evident in our conversations and work with our daughter. She was very responsive to my questions and often sent articles and other materials about language development that I found helpful. Thankfully, my daughter's speech improved tremendously. Michelle developed such a warm relationship with my daughter. My daughter was always excited to see Michelle and would greet her at the door with a big hug. Lastly, I would add that Michelle always demonstrated empathy with me as a mother who was initially worried about her daughter's language development. I could go on and on about how pleased we were with Michelle's work."
  • Avatar Andrea Peartree ★★★★★ 4 years ago
    Theo is a wonderful Clinton Hill speech therapist. We were really pleased with him. Our son showed drastic improvement, not only in his speech but in his confidence.
  • Avatar mario costa ★★★★★ 4 years ago
    Alexa has been an enthusiastic, reliable, well prepared and caring teacher for our 6 year old daughter. She has been able to improve and increase our daughter's confidence lesson by lesson with patience and competence; through varied … More and productive didactic practice. Alexa has engaged our daughter in several activities that always kept her motivated and eager to learn literacy. My wife and I, both of us are educators, feel so fortunate to have had the opportunity to observe Alexa's pedagogical skills. Alexa has had a big impact on our daughter literacy growth. Thank you Brooklyn Letters!
  • Avatar Lily Alt ★★★★★ 4 years ago
    We were absolutely DELIGHTED with Marsha's services. She was wonderful. We found her to be kind, fun, engaging, very knowledgeable. She provided us with clear instructions and additional written handouts each week. She engaged our … More son with different techniques and toys, and showed us how to use her techniques when we were interacting with him. I actually just texted her on Saturday - Our son finally said "more" - one of the target words we had been working on with her. It was a total joy to hear, and I had to share it with her - she wrote back immediately to congratulate us. I am so appreciative of her expertise, and wish we could have seen her for longer. I recommended her to another family in our neighborhood who is looking for a speech therapist.

Yelp (also view our 35+ filtered reviews)

UNDERSTANDING DYSLEXIA: What Connecticut Parents, Teachers, and Educators Need to Know

What Connecticut Parents, Teachers, and Educators Need to Know

UNDERSTANDING DYSLEXIA: What Connecticut Parents, Teachers, and Educators Need to Know

What Connecticut Parents, Teachers, and Educators Need to Know

Free, Research-Based Summer Reading Support for Connecticut Students

Is your child behind in reading fluency or struggling with dyslexia? If so, you’re not alone—and the right support can make a significant difference in your child’s confidence and progress.

We’re partnering with an evidence-based, research-backed reading initiative that supports Connecticut students who are behind in reading—including those with diagnosed or suspected dyslexia. To make it easy to get started, we’ve broken the process down into a few simple steps.

Get started in 3 simple steps:

  1. Sign up using the form below
  2. Complete a short survey about your child’s reading needs
  3. Receive details about free summer reading support

By completing these steps, you’ll take an important first move toward getting structured, targeted help in place for your child this summer.

Free Summer Reading Program
Introduction: Dyslexia in Connecticut Schools

Dyslexia is one of the most common language-based learning disabilities seen in Connecticut’s public and private schools, and understanding it helps families advocate more effectively. It does not mean a student lacks intelligence or effort. Instead, dyslexia is a neurodevelopmental, language-based condition that affects how the brain processes spoken and written language.

Students with dyslexia often struggle with several related academic skills. These difficulties tend to cluster in predictable ways, especially around reading and writing.

Students with dyslexia often struggle with:

  • Learning letter–sound relationships
  • Decoding (sounding out) words
  • Spelling and written expression
  • Reading fluency and comprehension

These challenges usually stem from weaknesses in phonological awareness—the ability to notice, think about, and manipulate the sounds in spoken words. When we see this pattern of strengths and weaknesses, it should prompt further evaluation and targeted intervention.

In Connecticut, students with specific learning disabilities (SLD)—which include dyslexia as a primary disability—represent the largest proportion of students served under IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act). In the 2020-2021 academic year, about 28,839 students in Connecticut were identified with SLD out of 78,393 students receiving IDEA services, indicating a significant portion have dyslexia or similar reading disabilities. A major Connecticut longitudinal study led by Yale indicates that reading disability affects approximately 1 in 5 children (or about 20%), a commonly cited statistic for dyslexia prevalence. This reflects the experience of many students struggling with reading in the state.

More broadly, recent literacy levels have shown concern, with only 64% of Connecticut students reading at grade level in 2022, down from 70% in 2019, suggesting that reading difficulties including dyslexia and other disabilities impact a substantial number of students.

Additional context from the Connecticut State Department of Education mentions that many students with SLD spend 80% or more of their school day in general education classrooms, highlighting inclusive education efforts.

Introduction Dyslexia in Connecticut Schools
Common Signs of Dyslexia by Age

Dyslexia looks different at each age and grade level, which is why it’s helpful to think about signs along a developmental timeline. Some students show clear early signs; others “fly under the radar” until demands increase in upper elementary, middle school, or even college.

Because dyslexia often overlaps with language disorders and executive function challenges, it’s important to pay attention to patterns over time—not just a single test score or a rough school year.

Preschool (Ages 3–5)

In early childhood, red flags often show up in speech, vocabulary, and play with sounds, rather than in formal reading tasks. When you observe the same types of challenges across home and preschool settings, it can be an early clue that your child may be at higher risk for later reading difficulties.

Possible signs include:

  • Delayed speech or limited vocabulary
      • Talking later than expected
      • Using short or incomplete sentences
      • Relying on gestures rather than words
  • Trouble remembering everyday words
      • Saying “that thing” instead of “cup,” “car,” or familiar objects
  • Weak awareness of rhymes and sounds
      • Not noticing rhymes in songs or books
      • Struggling to clap or tap syllables in words
  • Difficulty learning colors, numbers, and letters
    • Confusing common colors
    • Skipping numbers when counting
    • Forgetting letters they just learned

If you recognize multiple signs from this list, especially when they persist over time, it may be worth requesting a speech-language or early literacy evaluation.

Early Elementary (Ages 5–8)

Once formal reading instruction begins, signs of dyslexia usually become more obvious in everyday classroom tasks. At this stage, the gap between a child’s thinking skills and reading skills often starts to widen.

Common indicators include:

      • Trouble breaking words into sounds (e.g., /k/ /a/ /t/ for cat)
      • Guessing words from pictures rather than sounding them out
  • Letter and sound confusions
      • Mixing up b/d, p/q, or m/w
      • Reading “big” for “dig,” or “was” for “saw”
      • If this continues beyond second grade, it may signal dyslexia
    • High-frequency words like the, said, was don’t become automatic
    • Spelling is inconsistent (e.g., “frend” for friend)
    • Reading aloud feels painful, slow, and effortful

If you see these patterns and they do not improve with extra practice, it’s a strong sign that your child needs more than “just reading more”—they likely need structured, research-based intervention.

Common Signs of Dyslexia by Age

Later Elementary (Ages 8–12)

In later elementary grades, schoolwork becomes more text-heavy across all subjects. Students with dyslexia may appear increasingly frustrated as the volume and complexity of reading grow.

In this age range, dyslexia tends to show up in several key areas that go beyond basic decoding.

Students with dyslexia may:

  • Read slowly and laboriously
      • Spend so much energy decoding words that they miss meaning
      • Guess at longer words rather than using decoding strategies
  • Continue to struggle with spelling and writing
      • Misspell common words even after repeated practice
      • Avoid writing, or write very short responses
      • Have good ideas but difficulty organizing them into paragraphs
  • Show reading struggles across subjects
    • Difficulty with math word problems
    • Trouble understanding science and social studies texts
    • Frustration with homework that involves long reading assignments

When difficulties follow this pattern in multiple classes, it’s a signal to look deeper at reading and language skills rather than assuming the student is “lazy” or “unmotivated.”

High School and Adulthood

Dyslexia does not “go away” in high school or adulthood, but many teens and adults develop strong compensatory strategies. Even so, they often still need accommodations and targeted support to perform at their true level.

As academic and workplace demands increase, the impact of dyslexia may show up most clearly in tasks that rely heavily on independent reading and writing.

Common signs include:

  • Persistent reading and writing difficulties
      • Relying heavily on audiobooks, summaries, or videos
      • Needing extra time on tests and assignments
      • Avoiding classes or careers that involve heavy reading
  • Difficulty with note-taking and written expression
      • Struggling to take notes while listening
      • Finding essays and written projects overwhelming
  • Challenges with foreign languages
    • Languages with inconsistent spelling (like English and French) are especially tough
    • Languages with more regular spelling (like Spanish) may be easier

If you or your teen recognize several of these signs, a formal evaluation and accommodations (like extended time, text-to-speech, and structured literacy support) can reduce barriers and open up more realistic academic and career options.

Introduction Dyslexia in Connecticut Schools
Common Signs of Dyslexia by Age

Dyslexia looks different at each age and grade level, which is why it’s helpful to think about signs along a developmental timeline. Some students show clear early signs; others “fly under the radar” until demands increase in upper elementary, middle school, or even college.

Because dyslexia often overlaps with language disorders and executive function challenges, it’s important to pay attention to patterns over time—not just a single test score or a rough school year.

Preschool (Ages 3–5)

In early childhood, red flags often show up in speech, vocabulary, and play with sounds, rather than in formal reading tasks. When you observe the same types of challenges across home and preschool settings, it can be an early clue that your child may be at higher risk for later reading difficulties.

Possible signs include:

  • Delayed speech or limited vocabulary
      • Talking later than expected
      • Using short or incomplete sentences
      • Relying on gestures rather than words
  • Trouble remembering everyday words
      • Saying “that thing” instead of “cup,” “car,” or familiar objects
  • Weak awareness of rhymes and sounds
      • Not noticing rhymes in songs or books
      • Struggling to clap or tap syllables in words
  • Difficulty learning colors, numbers, and letters
    • Confusing common colors
    • Skipping numbers when counting
    • Forgetting letters they just learned

If you recognize multiple signs from this list, especially when they persist over time, it may be worth requesting a speech-language or early literacy evaluation.

Early Elementary (Ages 5–8)

Once formal reading instruction begins, signs of dyslexia usually become more obvious in everyday classroom tasks. At this stage, the gap between a child’s thinking skills and reading skills often starts to widen.

Common indicators include:

      • Trouble breaking words into sounds (e.g., /k/ /a/ /t/ for cat)
      • Guessing words from pictures rather than sounding them out
  • Letter and sound confusions
      • Mixing up b/d, p/q, or m/w
      • Reading “big” for “dig,” or “was” for “saw”
      • If this continues beyond second grade, it may signal dyslexia
    • High-frequency words like the, said, was don’t become automatic
    • Spelling is inconsistent (e.g., “frend” for friend)
    • Reading aloud feels painful, slow, and effortful

If you see these patterns and they do not improve with extra practice, it’s a strong sign that your child needs more than “just reading more”—they likely need structured, research-based intervention.

Common Signs of Dyslexia by Age

Later Elementary (Ages 8–12)

In later elementary grades, schoolwork becomes more text-heavy across all subjects. Students with dyslexia may appear increasingly frustrated as the volume and complexity of reading grow.

In this age range, dyslexia tends to show up in several key areas that go beyond basic decoding.

Students with dyslexia may:

  • Read slowly and laboriously
      • Spend so much energy decoding words that they miss meaning
      • Guess at longer words rather than using decoding strategies
  • Continue to struggle with spelling and writing
      • Misspell common words even after repeated practice
      • Avoid writing, or write very short responses
      • Have good ideas but difficulty organizing them into paragraphs
  • Show reading struggles across subjects
    • Difficulty with math word problems
    • Trouble understanding science and social studies texts
    • Frustration with homework that involves long reading assignments

When difficulties follow this pattern in multiple classes, it’s a signal to look deeper at reading and language skills rather than assuming the student is “lazy” or “unmotivated.”

High School and Adulthood

Dyslexia does not “go away” in high school or adulthood, but many teens and adults develop strong compensatory strategies. Even so, they often still need accommodations and targeted support to perform at their true level.

As academic and workplace demands increase, the impact of dyslexia may show up most clearly in tasks that rely heavily on independent reading and writing.

Common signs include:

  • Persistent reading and writing difficulties
      • Relying heavily on audiobooks, summaries, or videos
      • Needing extra time on tests and assignments
      • Avoiding classes or careers that involve heavy reading
  • Difficulty with note-taking and written expression
      • Struggling to take notes while listening
      • Finding essays and written projects overwhelming
  • Challenges with foreign languages
    • Languages with inconsistent spelling (like English and French) are especially tough
    • Languages with more regular spelling (like Spanish) may be easier

If you or your teen recognize several of these signs, a formal evaluation and accommodations (like extended time, text-to-speech, and structured literacy support) can reduce barriers and open up more realistic academic and career options.

How Dyslexia Is Defined as a Learning Disability in Connecticut
How Dyslexia Is Defined as a Learning Disability in Connecticut

In Connecticut, dyslexia is recognized as a Specific Learning Disability (SLD) under IDEA and state law. This legal recognition gives students specific rights to appropriate evaluation, instruction, and accommodations in public schools.

To understand how schools make decisions, it helps to know which skills are typically affected and what is not considered the cause of dyslexia.

The Connecticut State Department of Education describes dyslexia as a language-based learning disability that affects:

  • Phonological processing (playing with the sounds in words)
  • Word recognition and decoding
  • Spelling
  • Reading fluency, and sometimes written expression

At the same time, certain factors are ruled out as the primary cause of a dyslexia diagnosis.

Key points:

  • Dyslexia is unexpected in relation to a student’s other abilities. Students are often average to above average in reasoning and problem solving.
  • Dyslexia is not caused by visual, hearing, or motor problems; emotional disturbance; lack of instruction; or economic disadvantage.
  • Dyslexia frequently coexists with ADHD, executive function challenges, and other learning differences.

Understanding these criteria helps families frame conversations in PPT meetings and ask for the kind of instruction that matches the underlying language-based needs of dyslexia.

Dyslexia vs. Other Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD)

Dyslexia is one type of SLD. It can overlap with, but is distinct from, other learning disabilities that affect math, writing, or broader language skills.

Comparing dyslexia with other SLDs can clarify which services and interventions are most appropriate.

Primary academic impact

  • Dyslexia: Basic reading skills, reading fluency, and spelling
  • Other SLDs: Oral expression, listening comprehension, written expression (including dysgraphia), math calculation and problem solving

Core deficit

  • Dyslexia: Phonological processing—the ability to identify and manipulate individual sounds in spoken language
  • Other SLDs: May involve visual-spatial processing, fine-motor skills, working memory, or other cognitive domains

Cognitive profile

  • Students with dyslexia often have:
    • Age-appropriate or strong reasoning skills
    • Solid listening comprehension and vocabulary
    • A noticeable gap between intellect and reading performance

Intervention focus

  • Dyslexia requires structured literacy—systematic, explicit instruction in phonology, phonics, spelling, morphology, and decoding (often Orton-Gillingham–based).
  • Other SLDs may need additional support such as math intervention, written expression support, or explicit instruction in organization and study skills.

By matching the type of difficulty to the right intervention, schools and families can design plans that address the root cause of the problem, not just the surface-level symptoms.

How Dyslexia Is Defined as a Learning Disability in Connecticut
How Dyslexia Is Defined as a Learning Disability in Connecticut

In Connecticut, dyslexia is recognized as a Specific Learning Disability (SLD) under IDEA and state law. This legal recognition gives students specific rights to appropriate evaluation, instruction, and accommodations in public schools.

To understand how schools make decisions, it helps to know which skills are typically affected and what is not considered the cause of dyslexia.

The Connecticut State Department of Education describes dyslexia as a language-based learning disability that affects:

  • Phonological processing (playing with the sounds in words)
  • Word recognition and decoding
  • Spelling
  • Reading fluency, and sometimes written expression

At the same time, certain factors are ruled out as the primary cause of a dyslexia diagnosis.

Key points:

  • Dyslexia is unexpected in relation to a student’s other abilities. Students are often average to above average in reasoning and problem solving.
  • Dyslexia is not caused by visual, hearing, or motor problems; emotional disturbance; lack of instruction; or economic disadvantage.
  • Dyslexia frequently coexists with ADHD, executive function challenges, and other learning differences.

Understanding these criteria helps families frame conversations in PPT meetings and ask for the kind of instruction that matches the underlying language-based needs of dyslexia.

Dyslexia vs. Other Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD)

Dyslexia is one type of SLD. It can overlap with, but is distinct from, other learning disabilities that affect math, writing, or broader language skills.

Comparing dyslexia with other SLDs can clarify which services and interventions are most appropriate.

Primary academic impact

  • Dyslexia: Basic reading skills, reading fluency, and spelling
  • Other SLDs: Oral expression, listening comprehension, written expression (including dysgraphia), math calculation and problem solving

Core deficit

  • Dyslexia: Phonological processing—the ability to identify and manipulate individual sounds in spoken language
  • Other SLDs: May involve visual-spatial processing, fine-motor skills, working memory, or other cognitive domains

Cognitive profile

  • Students with dyslexia often have:
    • Age-appropriate or strong reasoning skills
    • Solid listening comprehension and vocabulary
    • A noticeable gap between intellect and reading performance

Intervention focus

  • Dyslexia requires structured literacy—systematic, explicit instruction in phonology, phonics, spelling, morphology, and decoding (often Orton-Gillingham–based).
  • Other SLDs may need additional support such as math intervention, written expression support, or explicit instruction in organization and study skills.

By matching the type of difficulty to the right intervention, schools and families can design plans that address the root cause of the problem, not just the surface-level symptoms.

Expanding Access to Dyslexia Diagnosis and Support in Connecticut State
Expanding Access to Dyslexia Diagnosis and Support in Connecticut State

Connecticut has taken significant steps to improve early identification and support for dyslexia, but implementation is still a work in progress. Understanding the main components of the state’s approach can help you track whether your district is meeting basic expectations.

At a high level, Connecticut’s dyslexia framework includes several major elements.

Connecticut has focused on:

  • Universal reading screening for K–3 students, several times per year
  • Emphasis on structured literacy instruction aligned with scientifically based reading research
  • Professional development requirements for educator preparation programs and in-service teachers
  • Creation of the Office of Dyslexia and Reading Disabilities (ODRD) to monitor compliance and support implementation statewide

In addition, the State Education Resource Center (SERC) partners with CSDE to provide practical tools for educators and families.

Support from SERC and state partners includes:

  • Free online training modules on SLD/dyslexia
  • Assessment guides and recommended screening tools
  • Family resources, including videos, handouts, and literacy guides

Despite this progress, Connecticut data and task force reports have shown gaps that still need attention.

The challenges identified include:

  • Under-identification of dyslexia (fewer than 1% formally identified, despite higher prevalence estimates)
  • A shortage of trained reading specialists
  • Inconsistent implementation of dyslexia laws and structured literacy practices across districts

By being aware of these strengths and gaps, parents and educators can ask more targeted questions and push for consistent, research-based implementation in every school.

Expanding Access to Dyslexia Diagnosis and Support in Connecticut State
Expanding Access to Dyslexia Diagnosis and Support in Connecticut State

Connecticut has taken significant steps to improve early identification and support for dyslexia, but implementation is still a work in progress. Understanding the main components of the state’s approach can help you track whether your district is meeting basic expectations.

At a high level, Connecticut’s dyslexia framework includes several major elements.

Connecticut has focused on:

  • Universal reading screening for K–3 students, several times per year
  • Emphasis on structured literacy instruction aligned with scientifically based reading research
  • Professional development requirements for educator preparation programs and in-service teachers
  • Creation of the Office of Dyslexia and Reading Disabilities (ODRD) to monitor compliance and support implementation statewide

In addition, the State Education Resource Center (SERC) partners with CSDE to provide practical tools for educators and families.

Support from SERC and state partners includes:

  • Free online training modules on SLD/dyslexia
  • Assessment guides and recommended screening tools
  • Family resources, including videos, handouts, and literacy guides

Despite this progress, Connecticut data and task force reports have shown gaps that still need attention.

The challenges identified include:

  • Under-identification of dyslexia (fewer than 1% formally identified, despite higher prevalence estimates)
  • A shortage of trained reading specialists
  • Inconsistent implementation of dyslexia laws and structured literacy practices across districts

By being aware of these strengths and gaps, parents and educators can ask more targeted questions and push for consistent, research-based implementation in every school.

The Critical Link Between Oral Language and Dyslexia

Reading is built on language, which means dyslexia is rarely just a “reading problem.” Many students with dyslexia have subtle or significant weaknesses in oral language that affect how easily they can learn to read and write.

These language-based skills can show up as strengths or challenges in several areas.

Students with dyslexia may have difficulties with:

  • Phonological awareness (hearing and manipulating sounds)
  • Vocabulary
  • Sentence structure and grammar
  • Listening comprehension

Research shows that early oral language delays increase the risk of later reading problems, and family history can also play a major role. Because of this, a high-quality dyslexia evaluation should go beyond reading tests.

When oral language is carefully assessed and supported alongside reading, interventions tend to be more effective and lead to stronger long-term outcomes.

The Critical Link Between Oral Language and Dyslexia

Reading is built on language, which means dyslexia is rarely just a “reading problem.” Many students with dyslexia have subtle or significant weaknesses in oral language that affect how easily they can learn to read and write.

These language-based skills can show up as strengths or challenges in several areas.

Students with dyslexia may have difficulties with:

  • Phonological awareness (hearing and manipulating sounds)
  • Vocabulary
  • Sentence structure and grammar
  • Listening comprehension

Research shows that early oral language delays increase the risk of later reading problems, and family history can also play a major role. Because of this, a high-quality dyslexia evaluation should go beyond reading tests.

When oral language is carefully assessed and supported alongside reading, interventions tend to be more effective and lead to stronger long-term outcomes.

Understanding Connecticut’s SRBI/RTI Framework
Understanding Connecticut’s SRBI RTI Framework

Connecticut’s version of  Response to Intervention (RTI), is called Scientific Research-Based Interventions (SRBI). It’s a multi-tiered system of support that provides increasingly intensive help when students show signs of academic or behavioral difficulty.

SRBI organizes support into three tiers, each with a different level of intensity and individualization.

The Three Tiers of SRBI/RTI

  • Tier 1: Core Instruction for All
      • High-quality, evidence-based reading instruction for every student
      • Universal screening in early grades
      • Progress monitoring to identify students who need more help
  • Tier 2: Targeted Small-Group Intervention
      • Extra reading support in small groups several times per week
      • Focus on specific skills such as phonemic awareness, phonics, or fluency
      • Continued progress monitoring
  • Tier 3: Intensive Individualized Intervention
    • More frequent sessions, often one-on-one or in very small groups
    • Highly individualized lessons using research-based programs
    • Close monitoring and data-based decisions

When implemented correctly, SRBI ensures students don’t have to “fail first” to receive help, but instead receive increasingly targeted support as soon as difficulties emerge.

Why SRBI Matters for Students with Dyslexia

SRBI is designed to:

  • Catch reading problems early before gaps widen
  • Provide structured, research-based interventions
  • Inform decisions about special education eligibility

For students with suspected dyslexia, SRBI data can be very useful, but it should not be used as a reason to delay or deny a full evaluation. Parents can and should request an evaluation if progress remains limited despite Tier 2 or Tier 3 support.

Understanding Connecticut’s SRBI/RTI Framework
Understanding Connecticut’s SRBI RTI Framework

Connecticut’s version of  Response to Intervention (RTI), is called Scientific Research-Based Interventions (SRBI). It’s a multi-tiered system of support that provides increasingly intensive help when students show signs of academic or behavioral difficulty.

SRBI organizes support into three tiers, each with a different level of intensity and individualization.

The Three Tiers of SRBI/RTI

  • Tier 1: Core Instruction for All
      • High-quality, evidence-based reading instruction for every student
      • Universal screening in early grades
      • Progress monitoring to identify students who need more help
  • Tier 2: Targeted Small-Group Intervention
      • Extra reading support in small groups several times per week
      • Focus on specific skills such as phonemic awareness, phonics, or fluency
      • Continued progress monitoring
  • Tier 3: Intensive Individualized Intervention
    • More frequent sessions, often one-on-one or in very small groups
    • Highly individualized lessons using research-based programs
    • Close monitoring and data-based decisions

When implemented correctly, SRBI ensures students don’t have to “fail first” to receive help, but instead receive increasingly targeted support as soon as difficulties emerge.

Why SRBI Matters for Students with Dyslexia

SRBI is designed to:

  • Catch reading problems early before gaps widen
  • Provide structured, research-based interventions
  • Inform decisions about special education eligibility

For students with suspected dyslexia, SRBI data can be very useful, but it should not be used as a reason to delay or deny a full evaluation. Parents can and should request an evaluation if progress remains limited despite Tier 2 or Tier 3 support.

Dyslexia Support: Public vs. Private Schools in Connecticut

Connecticut families often need to weigh the strengths and limitations of both public and private school options when deciding how to support a child with dyslexia. Each setting offers different possibilities and constraints.

Dyslexia in Connecticut Public Schools

Connecticut public schools are legally required to identify and support students with disabilities, including SLD/dyslexia. This means districts must consider both instruction and accommodations.

Public schools are responsible for:

  • Identifying students who may have disabilities
  • Providing free appropriate public education (FAPE) under IDEA and Section 504
  • Offering structured literacy interventions aligned with state reading laws and guidance from ODRD

Recent policy efforts and funding have tried to strengthen special education, but families often still experience variability.

Because public school services can differ widely from district to district, families may need to monitor progress closely and seek clarifications when supports do not match their child’s documented needs.

Dyslexia in Connecticut Private Schools

Connecticut also has independent schools and programs that specialize in dyslexia and language-based learning disabilities. These programs can be a good fit for students who need a more intensive, specialized environment than their local public school can provide.

Specialized private programs often offer:

  • Small class sizes and low student-to-teacher ratios
  • Individually tailored learning plans
  • Structured literacy (often Orton-Gillingham or Wilson)
  • Strong focus on executive functioning, self-advocacy, and confidence

Families may explore:

  • Full-time placement in a specialized school
  • After-school or summer tutoring with dyslexia specialists
  • Tuition reimbursement or out-of-district placement when public schools cannot provide appropriate services

Parents should consider both the instructional model and the emotional climate of any school or program to determine whether it is a good fit for their child. Schools such as Ben Bronz Academy, Southport School, The Pinnacle School, Winston Preparatory School, Franklin Academy, Cajal Academy, and Forman School provide specialized instruction, individualized learning plans, and evidence-based interventions

Dyslexia Support: Public vs. Private Schools in Connecticut

Connecticut families often need to weigh the strengths and limitations of both public and private school options when deciding how to support a child with dyslexia. Each setting offers different possibilities and constraints.

Dyslexia in Connecticut Public Schools

Connecticut public schools are legally required to identify and support students with disabilities, including SLD/dyslexia. This means districts must consider both instruction and accommodations.

Public schools are responsible for:

  • Identifying students who may have disabilities
  • Providing free appropriate public education (FAPE) under IDEA and Section 504
  • Offering structured literacy interventions aligned with state reading laws and guidance from ODRD

Recent policy efforts and funding have tried to strengthen special education, but families often still experience variability.

Because public school services can differ widely from district to district, families may need to monitor progress closely and seek clarifications when supports do not match their child’s documented needs.

Dyslexia in Connecticut Private Schools

Connecticut also has independent schools and programs that specialize in dyslexia and language-based learning disabilities. These programs can be a good fit for students who need a more intensive, specialized environment than their local public school can provide.

Specialized private programs often offer:

  • Small class sizes and low student-to-teacher ratios
  • Individually tailored learning plans
  • Structured literacy (often Orton-Gillingham or Wilson)
  • Strong focus on executive functioning, self-advocacy, and confidence

Families may explore:

  • Full-time placement in a specialized school
  • After-school or summer tutoring with dyslexia specialists
  • Tuition reimbursement or out-of-district placement when public schools cannot provide appropriate services

Parents should consider both the instructional model and the emotional climate of any school or program to determine whether it is a good fit for their child. Schools such as Ben Bronz Academy, Southport School, The Pinnacle School, Winston Preparatory School, Franklin Academy, Cajal Academy, and Forman School provide specialized instruction, individualized learning plans, and evidence-based interventions

Where Can Parents Test for Dyslexia in Connecticut?
Where Can Parents Test for Dyslexia in Connecticut

A comprehensive dyslexia evaluation is an important step in understanding your child’s learning profile and advocating for the right services. Evaluations can be done through the public school system or by private evaluators.

Quality evaluations usually include multiple types of information rather than relying on a single test.

A thorough dyslexia assessment typically involves:

  • Detailed developmental and educational history
  • Standardized tests of:
    • Phonological processing
    • Decoding and word recognition
    • Spelling and writing
    • Oral language and listening comprehension
    • Rapid naming and working memory
  • Classroom observations and work samples

Connecticut families can pursue:

  • Public school evaluation through the Planning and Placement Team (PPT) process
  • Independent evaluations from neuropsychologists, psychologists, educational diagnosticians, or SLPs with literacy expertise
  • Guidance and resource lists from SERC and the International Dyslexia Association (IDA)

Testing and Assessment Resources:

When families combine thorough assessment with ongoing progress monitoring, they are better equipped to choose interventions that match their child’s profile.

Where Can Parents Test for Dyslexia in Connecticut?
Where Can Parents Test for Dyslexia in Connecticut

A comprehensive dyslexia evaluation is an important step in understanding your child’s learning profile and advocating for the right services. Evaluations can be done through the public school system or by private evaluators.

Quality evaluations usually include multiple types of information rather than relying on a single test.

A thorough dyslexia assessment typically involves:

  • Detailed developmental and educational history
  • Standardized tests of:
    • Phonological processing
    • Decoding and word recognition
    • Spelling and writing
    • Oral language and listening comprehension
    • Rapid naming and working memory
  • Classroom observations and work samples

Connecticut families can pursue:

  • Public school evaluation through the Planning and Placement Team (PPT) process
  • Independent evaluations from neuropsychologists, psychologists, educational diagnosticians, or SLPs with literacy expertise
  • Guidance and resource lists from SERC and the International Dyslexia Association (IDA)

Testing and Assessment Resources:

When families combine thorough assessment with ongoing progress monitoring, they are better equipped to choose interventions that match their child’s profile.

The Connecticut Dyslexia and Dysgraphia Task Force: Key Findings

The Connecticut State Dyslexia and Dysgraphia Task Force (convened in 2019) reviewed how well existing laws were being implemented. Its 2020 report revealed important trends that still influence policy and practice today.

The Task Force identified several major concerns.

Key findings included:

  • Dyslexia was under-identified statewide, with fewer than 1% of students formally identified despite higher estimates of prevalence
  • There was a shortage of qualified reading and dyslexia specialists
  • Connecticut lacked a clear system for monitoring compliance with dyslexia legislation

To address these issues, the Task Force proposed multiple action steps.

Recommended improvements focused on:

  • Clearer accountability measures for districts and teacher preparation programs
  • Stronger standards for educator training in structured literacy
  • Better guidance and tools for districts, parents, and educators

These recommendations provide a roadmap for advocates and policymakers who want to push Connecticut toward more consistent and effective dyslexia support.

The Connecticut Dyslexia and Dysgraphia Task Force: Key Findings

The Connecticut State Dyslexia and Dysgraphia Task Force (convened in 2019) reviewed how well existing laws were being implemented. Its 2020 report revealed important trends that still influence policy and practice today.

The Task Force identified several major concerns.

Key findings included:

  • Dyslexia was under-identified statewide, with fewer than 1% of students formally identified despite higher estimates of prevalence
  • There was a shortage of qualified reading and dyslexia specialists
  • Connecticut lacked a clear system for monitoring compliance with dyslexia legislation

To address these issues, the Task Force proposed multiple action steps.

Recommended improvements focused on:

  • Clearer accountability measures for districts and teacher preparation programs
  • Stronger standards for educator training in structured literacy
  • Better guidance and tools for districts, parents, and educators

These recommendations provide a roadmap for advocates and policymakers who want to push Connecticut toward more consistent and effective dyslexia support.

Navigating IEPs, 504 Plans, and Independent Educational Evaluations (IEEs) in Connecticut
Navigating IEPs, 504 Plans, and Independent Educational Evaluations (IEEs) in Connecticut

Understanding the difference between school-based eligibility and a clinical diagnosis helps parents make informed choices. Both types of information matter, but they serve different purposes.

IEP Eligibility vs. a Medical Dyslexia Diagnosis

A medical or clinical diagnosis of dyslexia is not enough, on its own, to guarantee an IEP. Schools must use educational criteria to determine which students qualify for special education services.

In Connecticut, the distinction generally looks like this:

  • IEP eligibility under IDEA is based on:
    • Documented academic impact
    • Lack of adequate progress despite appropriate instruction
    • The need for specially designed instruction
  • A clinical diagnosis (from a psychologist or neuropsychologist) focuses on:
    • Neurological and cognitive factors
    • Test data and clinical observations

When families understand this distinction, they can use clinical information to strengthen their case while still addressing the school’s responsibility to evaluate educational impact.

Navigating IEPs, 504 Plans, and Independent Educational Evaluations (IEEs) in Connecticut
Navigating IEPs, 504 Plans, and Independent Educational Evaluations (IEEs) in Connecticut

Understanding the difference between school-based eligibility and a clinical diagnosis helps parents make informed choices. Both types of information matter, but they serve different purposes.

IEP Eligibility vs. a Medical Dyslexia Diagnosis

A medical or clinical diagnosis of dyslexia is not enough, on its own, to guarantee an IEP. Schools must use educational criteria to determine which students qualify for special education services.

In Connecticut, the distinction generally looks like this:

  • IEP eligibility under IDEA is based on:
    • Documented academic impact
    • Lack of adequate progress despite appropriate instruction
    • The need for specially designed instruction
  • A clinical diagnosis (from a psychologist or neuropsychologist) focuses on:
    • Neurological and cognitive factors
    • Test data and clinical observations

When families understand this distinction, they can use clinical information to strengthen their case while still addressing the school’s responsibility to evaluate educational impact.

Independent Educational Evaluations (IEEs) in Connecticut

If you disagree with the school district’s evaluation, you have the right to request an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) at public expense. This process can feel intimidating, but it follows a clear sequence of steps.

Parents typically move through the IEE process in the following way.

Basic steps in Connecticut:

  1. Make the request
    • Ask verbally and follow up in writing.
    • State that you disagree with the district’s evaluation and are requesting an IEE at public expense.
  2. District response
    • The district must respond without unnecessary delay (often around 10 school days during the school year).
    • They must either:
      • Agree to fund the IEE and provide a list of evaluators, or
      • File for due process to defend their evaluation.
  3. Evaluation and PPT meeting
    • You choose an evaluator who meets district criteria (you can challenge unreasonable limits).
    • Once the evaluation is complete, the team meets to review and consider the results.
    • The district must consider IEE recommendations but is not required to adopt every recommendation.

If your request is denied and you disagree with the district’s actions, you can explore advocacy and legal options.

Families who understand their rights around IEEs are usually better able to push for comprehensive data and appropriate services when the school’s evaluation feels incomplete or inaccurate.

Independent Educational Evaluations (IEEs) in Connecticut

If you disagree with the school district’s evaluation, you have the right to request an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) at public expense. This process can feel intimidating, but it follows a clear sequence of steps.

Parents typically move through the IEE process in the following way.

Basic steps in Connecticut:

  1. Make the request
    • Ask verbally and follow up in writing.
    • State that you disagree with the district’s evaluation and are requesting an IEE at public expense.
  2. District response
    • The district must respond without unnecessary delay (often around 10 school days during the school year).
    • They must either:
      • Agree to fund the IEE and provide a list of evaluators, or
      • File for due process to defend their evaluation.
  3. Evaluation and PPT meeting
    • You choose an evaluator who meets district criteria (you can challenge unreasonable limits).
    • Once the evaluation is complete, the team meets to review and consider the results.
    • The district must consider IEE recommendations but is not required to adopt every recommendation.

If your request is denied and you disagree with the district’s actions, you can explore advocacy and legal options.

Families who understand their rights around IEEs are usually better able to push for comprehensive data and appropriate services when the school’s evaluation feels incomplete or inaccurate.

CT Dyslexia Programs, Structured Literacy, and Specialized Support

Connecticut families often combine school-based services with private specialized tutoring to close reading gaps and support self-confidence. Structured literacy programs are especially helpful because they follow a clear sequence and explicitly teach sound–symbol patterns.

You may encounter several well-known programs and approaches in Connecticut.

Examples of structured literacy programs you may see in CT:

  • Wilson Reading System®
  • Fundations®
  • Orton-Gillingham–based approaches
  • Other multisensory, systematic decoding and spelling programs

Digital platforms such as IXL can provide extra practice when used to reinforce, not replace, direct instruction in decoding, spelling, and comprehension.

Remote Dyslexia Tutoring for Connecticut Families

Many families supplement school services with 1:1, research-based tutoring, especially when progress at school has plateaued. Remote options make it easier to match your child with a specialist who understands dyslexia.

Specialized tutoring services can help by offering:

  • Intensive, structured literacy instruction tailored to your child’s profile
  • Executive function coaching to support planning, organization, and homework follow-through
  • Regular communication with families about progress and strategies that work

When school supports and private tutoring are aligned, students often make faster and more sustainable gains in reading and confidence.

CT Dyslexia Programs, Structured Literacy, and Specialized Support

Connecticut families often combine school-based services with private specialized tutoring to close reading gaps and support self-confidence. Structured literacy programs are especially helpful because they follow a clear sequence and explicitly teach sound–symbol patterns.

You may encounter several well-known programs and approaches in Connecticut.

Examples of structured literacy programs you may see in CT:

  • Wilson Reading System®
  • Fundations®
  • Orton-Gillingham–based approaches
  • Other multisensory, systematic decoding and spelling programs

Digital platforms such as IXL can provide extra practice when used to reinforce, not replace, direct instruction in decoding, spelling, and comprehension.

Remote Dyslexia Tutoring for Connecticut Families

Many families supplement school services with 1:1, research-based tutoring, especially when progress at school has plateaued. Remote options make it easier to match your child with a specialist who understands dyslexia.

Specialized tutoring services can help by offering:

  • Intensive, structured literacy instruction tailored to your child’s profile
  • Executive function coaching to support planning, organization, and homework follow-through
  • Regular communication with families about progress and strategies that work

When school supports and private tutoring are aligned, students often make faster and more sustainable gains in reading and confidence.

Advocacy Spotlight: Dan Malloy and Early Dyslexia Screening
Advocacy Spotlight Dan Malloy and Early Dyslexia Screening

Former Stamford mayor and Connecticut governor Dannel “Dan” Malloy has been open about his own severe dyslexia. His story offers a powerful example of how early challenges can coexist with significant academic and professional achievement.

Malloy’s advocacy highlights several important truths about dyslexia.

His experience underscores that:

  • Students with dyslexia can succeed in college, law school, and public leadership
  • Early screening and structured literacy are essential for equity
  • Policy shifts must be paired with real classroom change, not just new laws

For families, his story serves as a reminder that with the right support, dyslexia can become a manageable difference rather than a lifelong barrier.

Advocacy Spotlight: Dan Malloy and Early Dyslexia Screening
Advocacy Spotlight Dan Malloy and Early Dyslexia Screening

Former Stamford mayor and Connecticut governor Dannel “Dan” Malloy has been open about his own severe dyslexia. His story offers a powerful example of how early challenges can coexist with significant academic and professional achievement.

Malloy’s advocacy highlights several important truths about dyslexia.

His experience underscores that:

  • Students with dyslexia can succeed in college, law school, and public leadership
  • Early screening and structured literacy are essential for equity
  • Policy shifts must be paired with real classroom change, not just new laws

For families, his story serves as a reminder that with the right support, dyslexia can become a manageable difference rather than a lifelong barrier.

Summary of Dyslexia Screening Tools for Parents

Connecticut families can use several tools and resources to spot early risk signs and advocate for formal evaluations. These tools don’t replace a full evaluation, but they provide valuable information to start conversations with schools.

Some commonly referenced tools and guides include the following.

When parents combine early screening tools with ongoing observation and documentation, they are better positioned to request timely intervention and avoid a “wait and see” approach that can delay help.

Summary of Dyslexia Screening Tools for Parents

Connecticut families can use several tools and resources to spot early risk signs and advocate for formal evaluations. These tools don’t replace a full evaluation, but they provide valuable information to start conversations with schools.

Some commonly referenced tools and guides include the following.

When parents combine early screening tools with ongoing observation and documentation, they are better positioned to request timely intervention and avoid a “wait and see” approach that can delay help.

Final Thoughts: The Future of Dyslexia Support in CT

The future of dyslexia support in Connecticut is promising, with strong legislative and educational focus advancing early screening, structured literacy instruction, and ongoing teacher training. In 2025, Connecticut prioritized enhanced special education funding to bridge resource gaps, improve classroom safety, and address the shortage of qualified special education professionals, all aimed at creating more equitable education for students with dyslexia and other disabilities. The Office of Dyslexia and Reading Disabilities, established in 2021, plays a central role in implementing policies, supporting educators, and providing resources statewide. With continued advocacy, research-driven practices, and statewide collaboration, Connecticut is working toward becoming a model state for dyslexia support, ensuring students access the literacy skills needed to succeed academically and in life.

Final Thoughts: The Future of Dyslexia Support in CT

The future of dyslexia support in Connecticut is promising, with strong legislative and educational focus advancing early screening, structured literacy instruction, and ongoing teacher training. In 2025, Connecticut prioritized enhanced special education funding to bridge resource gaps, improve classroom safety, and address the shortage of qualified special education professionals, all aimed at creating more equitable education for students with dyslexia and other disabilities. The Office of Dyslexia and Reading Disabilities, established in 2021, plays a central role in implementing policies, supporting educators, and providing resources statewide. With continued advocacy, research-driven practices, and statewide collaboration, Connecticut is working toward becoming a model state for dyslexia support, ensuring students access the literacy skills needed to succeed academically and in life.

Key Connecticut Resources for Dyslexia

Connecticut offers a strong network of organizations, agencies, and advocacy groups that support families navigating dyslexia. Knowing where to start can save time and reduce stress.

Below are categories of resources that many families find helpful.

Resources for CT Families
Organizations and Websites
Best Local Resources
Legal References

Key Connecticut Resources for Dyslexia

Connecticut offers a strong network of organizations, agencies, and advocacy groups that support families navigating dyslexia. Knowing where to start can save time and reduce stress.

Below are categories of resources that many families find helpful.

Resources for CT Families

 

Organizations and Websites

 

Best Local Resources
Legal References

FREE CONSULTATION!!!
Call: (347) 394-3485,
Text: (917) 426-8880

Email: [email protected]
(we respond to email right away!) 

Close Menu