This is a controversial topic among speech therapists but not among speech researchers! Oral motor therapy can be divided into speech oral motor therapy, which can be very effective, and non-speech oral motor therapy (ineffective). Let’s start with the term oral motor which is an ambiguous term to begin with. Personally, I use the terms articulation speech difficulties and/or phonological speech difficulties (whole other discussion). Speech therapists who incorporate non-speech oral motor techniques learn them at professional trainings post graduation when trends are prioritized over science. The content of these professional trainings are not endorsed by ASHA: American Speech Hearing Association. The majority (85% according to Dr. Gregg Lof’s research) of speech therapists use ineffective protocols when diagnosing and/or treating “oral motor” speech problems.
I have seen many children misdiagnosed and, as a result, receive ineffective treatment. In essence, when working on articulation (speech oral-motor), effective therapy always includes the production or shaping of a sound, e.g. close your lips and say “mmm” to teach /m/ or if the child is omitting a final “p” in words, the clinician helps the child say final “p” in short words, e.g. “hop”, “top”, “mop”, etc. Working on sounds during speech therapy is natural because it includes facilitating motor planning (agility), mouth strength, and linguistics.
Non-speech oral motor exercises, which are purported to strengthen muscles and/or improve muscle tone, includes blowing whistles, sucking straws, and chewing on chewy tubes. It does not involve working on actual sounds: agility, strength, and linguistics! It may improve general oral mouth muscle/tone but there is NO scientific evidence that it actually improves speech. Our mouths are used for a variety of functions, e.g. breathing, drinking, chewing, swallowing, etc. It is important not to generalize.
Speech is special! We use minimal muscle strength to talk. Tone is important when the speech muscles are at rest, while strength is important for chewing not talking. Speech learning is primarily based on agility (motor planning, think of a ventriloquist) and our brains (cognitive/linguistic). Other animals vocalize but can’t talk; the difference resides in our brains, not our mouths! That’s the beauty of evolution.
An analogy, for example, is performing finger strength exercises to become a better piano player. Strong fingers and lack of actual piano practice is the equivalent of non-speech oral motor therapy. Would you hire a piano teacher who works only on strengthening your child’s finger muscles? Speech scientists strongly advise that speech therapy focuses on techniques where the speech therapist works on shaping and/or producing sounds of a given language.
To quote an excerpt from a Letter to the Editor, from the NY Times (1/24/12), the following sums up what happens in the therapy world (no matter what profession):
“We frequently receive manuscripts in which people promote ideas and theories without adequate data, usually in pursuit of personal fame or monetary gain. Although the peer-reviewed medical literature is not without flaws, there is no better way than peer review to vet information before it is used in the diagnosis and treatment of disease. At least in medicine, we should think carefully before we decide that more, unfiltered information is better information.”
-Jeffrey M. Drazen, M.D.
The writer is editor in chief, The New England Journal of Medicine.
